Find answers, ask experts and talk with the procurement community
Do you want to deliver savings faster, reduce risks and transform functional performance?
Industry leading events
Inspirational leading procurement thinkers and innovators, providing unique opportunities to network and share best practice.
In this guest post, the second in a series on tackling complex spend, Procurement Leaders invites Vantage Partners’ Danny Ertel to look at how procurement teams should go about engaging with stakeholders to start to manage difficult categories.
In last month’s column we highlighted the barriers to procurement involvement in what may be a huge, largely unaddressed category of spend – complex professional services such as consulting, marketing, legal, etc. One of the most significant of those barriers is resistance by typically senior, highly expert stakeholders, who fiercely protect their autonomy and their preferred providers.
The key to persuading such stakeholders is to change procurement’s value proposition. Instead of asking a chief marketing officer, general counsel, or other functional or business unit leader to let procurement run a sourcing event – which to their ears will sound something like "replace my trusted advisor with someone cheaper, leaving me to bear the risks and clean up the mess" – procurement needs to consider ways to help address what such stakeholders might actually consider to be in need of fixing.
Change the value proposition
It is in the nature of these services that expertise, judgment, and trusted relationships are of paramount importance. Value gains thus have to come through process improvements, service unbundling, innovation, risk reduction, and incentive alignment, rather than through discounts.
The real opportunities are in identifying ways that suppliers can help the company better meet its business objectives, avoid costs, consume less, and become less expensive to serve. Supplier margin compression is possible, but there are real limits to those strategies in these categories. Instead of leading with savings, consider the ways in which procurement can help business stakeholders gain a better return on their investments in these services.
|Sourcing Value Propositions||Levers of Value|
|Improve reliability of department budgets||
|Engage optimal talent for each assignment||
|Enhance vendor performance||
|Improve business case for spend||
|Improve value for investment/budget||
Do your homework; engage early and often
Like the service providers who sell complex services to your stakeholders, try to engage in consultative selling: Do your homework, ask lots of questions, and build relationships over time; try to add value as you engage with prospective internal clients; and tailor your solutions to meet the concerns and desires of their clients.
Recognise that unlike other categories of indirect spend, buyers view complex services as critical enablers of business results, and thus, that measures of value achieved and ROI are much more relevant to buyers than are measures of savings. Ask smart questions about how stakeholders assess their service providers, how they drive them to do better, and what steps buyers have already pursued to bring fees down and make them more predictable.
Find out what their peers at other companies are doing, especially those who are being called out as “leaders” by their respective professional organizations, and ask questions of your internal stakeholders about what they think of those kinds of initiatives. Consider sharing lessons you have learned in procuring other services or materials that might be useful to buyers of complex services.
These kinds of smaller elements of engagement can demonstrate your knowledge and may enable you to get into the conversation with stakeholders without eliciting defensive, turf-protecting reactions. Next month we’ll start delving into proven value-adding strategies you can pursue once you get past the initial resistance.
Danny Ertel is a partner at Vantage Partners.